CO Gov. Bill Ritter Screws Labor

Given the amount of promotion of Colorado as a "blue state" miracle in the west and a model for Dems across the country, the latest policy decision from Gov. Bill Ritter makes this progressive wonder what the point of electing Dems in the first place is.

Friday Ritter vetoed a bill that would have revisesd the union eletion process, making it easier for employees to form unions. This comes after promising, in writing, to sign such a bill if it ever reached his desk.

On the other side of the flip I've included the relevant passages from the Denver Buisness Journal and a few editorial comments.

Here's the link from the Denver Business Journal

http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/storie s/2007/02/05/daily80.html

Choice quotes:

"Gov. Bill Ritter vetoed the controversial pro-labor House Bill 1072 Friday, telling Capitol reporters that he thought the process that brought it to his desk was flawed and the debate rhetoric overheated.

Ritter, however, said he agreed with the bill "in substance" and would have signed it had the process been different.

"Opposite sides dug in, refusing to consider reasonable compromises," Ritter said in his veto letter. "The bill's proponents made no effort to open a dialogue with the opponents. At times, the opponents were neither respectful nor civil. It was overheated politics at its worst."

The measure, sponsored by Rep. Michael Garcia, D-Aurora, did away with the current two-step election process that unions and employers must go through before striking all-union shop agreements. All-union agreements require all of a company's employees to pay union dues as a condition of employment. While they must pay fees, workers can't be forced to join a union under federal law.

During the campaign, Ritter told two labor organizations in written questionnaires he would support eliminating the second election.

"But I strongly believe that the way we do the people's business is as important as what we do," he said.

Ritter was under heavy pressure by business groups to veto the measure. They said the pro-union bill would send the wrong message to prospective employers looking to expand or relocate to Colorado."

You know, with CO being touted as a "blue state" model, you wonder why you can't get a blue governor to actually step up and support organized labor, which means so much to blue electoral chances.

Obviously, this points out the necessity of holding elected offical accountable to their promises and bolsters the argument for a progressive infrastructure independent of any particular party.

Regardless, the fact that a blue governor with a blue legislature won't sing somehting as important to blue electoral chances as a low stregnthing the right to organize is alarming and needs to be addressed.

I would suggest called to Ritter's office decrying the veto and insisting that he sign a new version of the bill those doens't cave to corporate interests.

Mail
Bill Ritter, Governor
136 State Capitol
Denver, CO 80203-1792

Phone
(303) 866-2471



Display:


So What's Going to Happen? (none / 0)

Any sense of whether the Bill will come back through the legislature this session?  It sounds like Ritter punted this time based upon "process" objections, but I doubt that will work if the bill comes back.  I hope the legislature pushes back on this one.


by HSTruman on Mon Feb 12, 2007 at 01:10:44 PM EST

Re: So What's Going to Happen? (none / 0)

I don't know. I suspect that there will be pushback since this was one of labor's biggest priorities, but I don't know enough about CO legislative politics to know what's going to happen next.


by nathanhj on Mon Feb 12, 2007 at 02:27:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: CO Gov. Bill Ritter Screws Labor (none / 0)

The bill wasn't about making it "easier to form a union" it was about what it takes to form an "all-union shop" the qualifications of which are similiar, though a little more difficult than just the ones to form a union. The Bill would have eliminated one of the two qualifictions in order to force an all-union shop upon a business. It was vetoed.

Personally, I think Bill Ritter is being short-sighted. He could have signed a bill and then just signed the inevitable "right-to-work" bill that no doubt would have followed and he'd come off as less un-democratic.


by DRR7979 on Mon Feb 12, 2007 at 02:12:25 PM EST

Re: CO Gov. Bill Ritter Screws Labor (none / 0)

You are right about the technicalities of the law. I was just using short-hand in an effort to avoid having to explain the whole thing. They are very similar ideas, even if the bill is limited in its scope.

I don't think he should sign the right to work law. If he can veto the union measure and give such a weak-ass reason, then he can veto any right to work legislation as well.


by nathanhj on Mon Feb 12, 2007 at 02:26:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: CO Gov. Bill Ritter Screws Labor (none / 0)

I happen to be familiar with what actually happened, since I'm in CO.

While the governor did shaft labor, labor did itself no favors by utterly failing to mobilize support for the bill. Moreover, progressives in general were caught flat-footed by opposition to HB 1072. Dick Wadhams, who managed George Allen's campaign in VA, is the new state GOP chair. He spent every day at the statehouse, managing the conservative pushback against this bill.

We did very little to combat that, and it's only going to get worse.


by Arkhangel on Mon Feb 12, 2007 at 10:38:09 PM EST

Re: CO Gov. Bill Ritter Screws Labor (none / 0)

Which goes straight to my earlier point about building infrastructure to hold electeds accountable. Without that, you get toasted.

While there are exemplars of labor in CO, most of it, like most of it in the rest of the country, is moribund and unable to adapt to the reality they find themselves in.

It's no wonder labor union membership as a 5 of the workforce dropped again.

All that said, it's still a stab in the back from the Gov to people who helped get him elected.


by nathanhj on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 11:51:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.